| Triple6_wild - Dec-22-2004 server time |
| i think its a lil late to start using carrots |
| Red Squirrel - Dec-21-2004 server time |
| Do those actually work? If I eat enough can I rid of my glasses? |
| Nathan - Dec-21-2004 server time |
| 1280*1024 on a 17" Use carrots guyz. |
| Tom - Dec-21-2004 server time |
| I use 1280 X 1024 and if I find a website that the font size is a little small then control and the scroll wheel fixes that |
| murphy2005 - Dec-21-2004 server time |
| 800X600.I only have a low end emachine |
| Triple6_wild - Dec-15-2004 server time | ||
no sex causes bad eyes |
| manadren - Dec-15-2004 server time |
| I run either 1280x1024 or 1600x1200 |
| sintekk - Dec-13-2004 server time |
| 1152 by 864 for me |
| Red Squirrel - Dec-13-2004 server time |
| 800*600 on a 19 inch? Why? I'd go hihger if I were you. |
| Triple6_wild - Dec-12-2004 server time |
| 19 inch flat screen viewsonic from staples for a 100 bux here lol havnt had a prob with it at all ryan .... not to expensive but anyways 800x600 n i do change it if i have to scroll sideways offen enuff to annoy me |
| Red Squirrel - Dec-12-2004 server time |
| Yeah my monitor can go higher, but it starts acting up if I go any higher. It's an old monitor though. I tried putting the refresh rate to 85 once. |
| Chris Vogel - Dec-12-2004 server time |
| 1024 x 768 here! |
| jryan - Dec-12-2004 server time |
| 1024x768 for me... I wouldn't be able to live without it. |
| Red Squirrel - Dec-12-2004 server time |
| I guess it's official this new feature won't be 1000px wide then. |
| Joe - Dec-12-2004 server time |
| 800x600 |
| Wren - Dec-12-2004 server time |
| 800 X 600 here...I really don't need anything bigger. |
| Furball - Dec-12-2004 server time |
| 800 x 600. I would need it or I wouldn't be able to see my screen from a distance. Damn 14". Time to invest in a 19" |
| Red Squirrel - Dec-12-2004 server time |
| Simple question. Just curious to see what reselutions everyone here is using. I'm planing on making a change in the cybervillage that will only work in high res so I want to make sure at least most of us are using 1024*768 or higher. Not that it won't work in lower, it just won't look as good but functionability won't be lost. |